[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:56:12 +0200 |
I've just committed that patch.
Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> Thanks for reporting that.
> With the following changes,
> ./gnulib-tool --test fts
> once again passes.
>
> 2005-08-24 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>
> * modules/fcntl-safer: New module.
> * modules/fts (Depends-on): Add fcntl-safer.
> * MODULES.html.sh (File descriptor based Input/Output):
> Add fcntl-safer.
>
> m4:
> 2005-08-24 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>
> Sync from coreutils.
> * fcntl-safer.m4: New file.
>
> lib:
> 2005-08-24 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>
> Sync from coreutils.
> * fcntl--.h, fcntl-safer.h, open-safer.c: New files.
- Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, James Youngman, 2005/08/08
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/09
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, James Youngman, 2005/08/09
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/10
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/14
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Eric Blake, 2005/08/23
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/24
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/24
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts,
Jim Meyering <=