[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:22:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Given that the parameter is called --version-script, I think
>> "version-script" would be a better name for the module.
>
> Even the suffix "-script" is a bit of a misnomer, IMO. I would call it
> 'symbol-versions'. If you agree with that, I'll rename the 'visbility'
> module to 'symbol-visibility', for consistency.
Sounds good, please do it.
OTOH, "symbol" has many meanings, so maybe "library-symbol-versions" or
"libsymbol-versions" would reduce potential for collisions, but the name
becomes quite long so I don't like it.
>> It seems (a) has already been fixed right?
>
> Nearly. Forgot to commit doc/gnulib.texi yesterday. Now I merged with your
> commit:
Thanks.
/Simon
- Re: linker-script.m4?, (continued)
- Re: linker-script.m4?, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/02
- Re: linker-script.m4?, Simon Josefsson, 2009/03/02
- Re: shared library symbol versioning, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/02
- Re: shared library symbol versioning, Simon Josefsson, 2009/03/02
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/02
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning, Simon Josefsson, 2009/03/02
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/02
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning, Simon Josefsson, 2009/03/03
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning, Simon Josefsson, 2009/03/03
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/03
- Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: linker-script.m4?, Mike Frysinger, 2009/03/02