[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenBSD 4.7 vs nanosleep
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: OpenBSD 4.7 vs nanosleep |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:13:41 +0200 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
Hi Bruno,
>> This isn't a show-stopper for the coreutils release.
>
> But it's easy to fix. The bug is actually in the gnulib replacement, which
> is missing a check on the validity of the argument.
>
>
> 2010-10-08 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
>
> nanosleep: Make replacement POSIX compliant.
> * lib/nanosleep.c (nanosleep): Return -1/EINVAL if the delay's tv_nsec
> is out of range.
> Reported by Jim Meyering.
I should have looked a little bit further ;-)
Thanks for the quick patch.