[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alloc_size attribute
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: alloc_size attribute |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:12:13 +0200 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> But did you intend to remove 2009 from those
>> two copyright year lists?
>
> Yes, since the two files were not really changed in 2009. A years-old habit
> of mine...
No big deal, but the maintainers guide encourages us to update the
year lists regardless of whether there are changes in a given year:
It is recommended and simpler to add the new year to all files in the
package, and be done with it for the rest of the year.
>> They look fine.
>
> Tested with gcc 4.3 and 4.2. I pushed it.
Thanks!
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/25
- Re: GCC and __builtin_object_size, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] inttostr.h: add compile-time buffer overrun checks, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/25
- Re: alloc_size attribute, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/17
- Re: alloc_size attribute, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/17
- Re: alloc_size attribute, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/17
- Re: alloc_size attribute,
Jim Meyering <=