[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:07:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-206-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Another possibility would be to libraryize Gnulib, scan that library
> once and record its false positives on your side once, and then change
> Gnulib-using packages to use that library instead of their in-source
> Gnulib copies. This would also be some work on your side, but it might
> fit better into your workflow.
This is nontrivial work. We started some of it in 2010; the current status
is written up in the file 'STATUS-libposix'. We haven't worked on it
for 10 years. Part of the problem is that we have no clue how to address
the versioning of this library.
Bruno
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, (continued)
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/10
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/10
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/10
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/10
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/10
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Paul Eggert, 2021/04/11
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/15
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Paul Eggert, 2021/04/15
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Paul Eggert, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/17
Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Ondrej Dubaj, 2021/04/12