[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] doc: mention that ls time ordering is newest first
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] doc: mention that ls time ordering is newest first |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 May 2011 12:24:40 +0200 |
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> FYI, in ls.c::usage() (and consequently the man page)
> I'm adding this non obvious info
>
> - otherwise: sort by ctime\n\
> + otherwise: sort by ctime, newest first\n\
>
> - -t sort by modification time\n\
> + -t sort by modification time, newest first\n\
Good idea.
Thanks!