[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: relpath
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: relpath |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:02 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 12/02/2011 01:21 AM, Guillaume Kielwasser wrote:
> and what about something like:
>
> getpath -C|--canon // simulate realpath
> getpath -R|--relative // simulate relpath
> getpath -L|--link // simulate readlink
A good suggestion, thanks.
It's the right level of functionality to provide at the shell level.
As for the getpath v realpath name, the advantage is that it's a separate
slightly less confusing name, the disadvantage being it's compatible
with no existing scripts. One doesn't necessarily outweigh the other,
I'm just stating to help with our final decision.
cheers,
Pádraig.
- Re: PATCH: relpath, (continued)
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Dmitry V. Levin, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Peng Yu, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Peng Yu, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Eric Blake, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Eric Blake, 2011/12/01
Re: PATCH: relpath, Peng Yu, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Eric Blake, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Dmitry V. Levin, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Guillaume Kielwasser, 2011/12/01
- Re: PATCH: relpath,
Pádraig Brady <=
- RE: PATCH: relpath, Voelker, Bernhard, 2011/12/02
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Sebastien Andre, 2011/12/02
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/02
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Sami Kerola, 2011/12/02
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/02
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/02
- Re: PATCH: relpath, Sebastien Andre, 2011/12/02
Re: PATCH: relpath, Erik Auerswald, 2011/12/02
Re: PATCH: relpath, Jim Meyering, 2011/12/02