[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] ln: add the --relative option
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] ln: add the --relative option |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:27:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 02/24/2012 12:12 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 09:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 02/23/2012 12:50 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>>> From: Harald Hoyer <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> With the "--relative --symbolic" options, ln computes the relative
>>> symbolic link for the user.
>>>
>>> So, ln works just as cp, but creates relative symbolic links instead
>>> of copying the file.
>>
>> In general, I like the idea. I will point out that we now have realpath
>> that also can compute relative locations to an arbitrary starting point,
>> so we probably ought to share the code between the two programs rather
>> than rewriting it.
>
> I like the functionality too.
> As Eric points out, the new `realpath` util has the
> relative path generation logic in it, which should be reused.
> To demonstrate the equivalence you could implement this
> functionality modulo option handling using `realpath` like:
>
> ln--relative() {
> target="$1"; link_name="$2"
> rtarget="$(realpath -m "$target" --relative-to "$(dirname "$link_name")")"
> ln -s -v "$rtarget" "$link_name"
> }
>
> Now given the simplicity of the above, there is the argument
> that new options within ln are not needed. We've discussed
> on and off the idea of a contrib/ folder in coreutils to
> provide generally useful but higher level commands like this.
> Worth considering at least.
Attached is a quick PoC refactoring to use existing code.
cheers,
Pádraig.
ln-relative-refactor.diff
Description: Text document
- Re: [PATCH v2] ln: add the --relative option,
Pádraig Brady <=