[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] seq: don't allow --equal-width option with infinite FIRS
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] seq: don't allow --equal-width option with infinite FIRST and LAST |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:32:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 07/26/2014 07:06 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> seq(1) could not determine the width of large values toward INF
> values. Therefore, specifying -w is useless in such a case.
>
> * src/seq.c (main): Output an error diagnostic when the -w option
> is specified together with non-finite values for FIRST or LAST.
> * tests/misc/seq.pl: Add tests.
> * NEWS (Changes in behavior): Mention the change.
We already restrict -w to be incompat with --format.
However that's an invariant aspect of seq invocation.
One might have a script that took the end point as a parameter,
which would now fail. I've a slight preference for the
existing behavior of ignoring -w in this case, like we
do for hex inputs for example.
thanks,
Pádraig.
- seq and infinite values, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/26
- [PATCH 1/2] seq: don't allow --equal-width option with infinite FIRST and LAST, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/26
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] seq: don't allow --equal-width option with infinite FIRST and LAST,
Pádraig Brady <=
- [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/26
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Pádraig Brady, 2014/07/26
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Pádraig Brady, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29