Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation

[Bernhard Voelker]

On 07/29/2014 09:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> As I understand the comments on that bug, the question there was whether
> other implementations allow 'sleep inf', and not whether strtod() is
> able to parse "inf".  It may well be that there is a non-GNU sleep that
> parses "inf" but not "infinity" because it hand-rolls its own parser
> instead of using strtod().

... which we wouldn't have a problem with, right?

Have a nice day,
Berny