[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documenta
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:10:34 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 07/29/2014 03:44 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 07/29/2014 09:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> -@code{-10e100}. Modern C implementations also accept hexadecimal
>> -floating point numbers such as @code{-0x.ep-3}, which stands for
>> -@minus{}14/16 times @math{2^-3}, which equals @minus{}0.109375. The
>> -@env{LC_NUMERIC} locale determines the decimal-point character.
>> -@xref{Parsing of Floats,,, libc, The GNU C Library Reference Manual}.
>> +@code{-10e100}. Commands that parse floating point also understand
>> +case-insensitive @code{inf}, @code{infinity}, and @code{NaN}, although
>> +whether such values are useful depends on the command in question.
>> +Modern C implementations also accept hexadecimal floating point
>> +numbers such as @code{-0x.ep-3}, which stands for @minus{}14/16 times
>> +@math{2^-3}, which equals @minus{}0.109375. The @env{LC_NUMERIC}
>> +locale determines the decimal-point character. @xref{Parsing of
>> +Floats,,, libc, The GNU C Library Reference Manual}.
>
> I like it.
Pushed.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] seq: don't allow --equal-width option with infinite FIRST and LAST, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/26
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Pádraig Brady, 2014/07/26
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Pádraig Brady, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/07/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: explicitly mention 'inf' values in seq(1) documentation, Eric Blake, 2014/07/29