[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:34:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
On 02/17/2015 04:14 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> "tee -" duplicates stdin to stdout (maybe in interleaved order)
> since v5.2.1-1247-g8dafbe5; this behavior is documented as such.
>
> But POSIX explicitly mandates different behavior:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/tee.html
>
> If a file operand is '-', it shall refer to a file named -;
> implementations shall not treat it as meaning standard output.
>
> I assume it's too late to revert the behavior to adhere to POSIX
> rules as it may break existing use cases.
> Shall we either document that the GNU tee implementation violates
> POSIX, or should we go for a change to POSIX to allow this (or is
> there already such a discussion)?
I'm not sure who would be relying on it, so I'm okay with treating it as
a bug fix to get into line with the POSIX wording. Another option would
be to keep the existing behavior by default, and comply with POSIX if
POSIXLY_CORRECT is set in the environment, but I don't like using the
POSIXLY_CORRECT escape hatch without good reason. I'm doubtful that the
POSIX folks would relax wording to allow coreutils' behavior; after all,
the possibility of interleaving duplicated output makes it less likely
to be useful, and therefore not worth standardizing.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/02/17
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/02/17
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Bob Proulx, 2015/02/17
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/02/18
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Eric Blake, 2015/02/18
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/02/18
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/02/18
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Eric Blake, 2015/02/18
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/02/19
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/02/19
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/02/20
- Re: "tee -" treating "-" as stdout violating POSIX?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/02/22