[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: removal of kill?
From: |
Tomas Nordin |
Subject: |
Re: removal of kill? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:53:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
For whatever it's worth:
$ uname -a
Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.68-1+deb7u1 i686 GNU/Linux
$ which kill
/bin/kill
$ kill -L
bash: kill: L: invalid signal specification
$ /bin/kill -L
1 HUP 2 INT 3 QUIT 4 ILL 5 TRAP 6 ABRT 7 BUS
8 FPE 9 KILL 10 USR1 11 SEGV 12 USR2 13 PIPE 14 ALRM
15 TERM 16 STKFLT 17 CHLD 18 CONT 19 STOP 20 TSTP 21 TTIN
22 TTOU 23 URG 24 XCPU 25 XFSZ 26 VTALRM 27 PROF 28 WINCH
29 POLL 30 PWR 31 SYS
/
Tomas
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:27:41PM +0000, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I see on most GNU/Linux distros that kill(1) is
> provided by the shell or util-linux.
> Should we just remove it from coreutils?
>
> We might move 'kill' to the disabled_by_default_progs
> list in build-aux/gen-lists-of-programs.sh,
> but I'm thinking we should do like we did with su
> and just remove it?
>
> What prompted this was noticing that util-linux
> and bash 4.4 have `kill -L` to produce a compact table,
> and balking at the idea of keeping these options in sync.
>
> cheers,
> Pádraig.
>
- Re: removal of kill?, (continued)
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Jim Meyering, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/11/10
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/10
- Re: removal of kill?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/11/10
Re: removal of kill?, Mike Frysinger, 2015/11/09
Re: removal of kill?, Stephane Chazelas, 2015/11/09
Re: removal of kill?,
Tomas Nordin <=