[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feature request for coreutils: b2sum
From: |
Zooko Wilcoz |
Subject: |
Re: feature request for coreutils: b2sum |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:04:44 +0000 |
Way to go! I'm really glad this is in here now and people can use it.
Pull-request: https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/pull/8
Regards,
Zooko
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2016 19:37, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 09/10/16 21:28, Mike Hodson wrote:
>> > At the risk of going somewhat offtopic of this list, however, as this
>> > is the one point of continual reference I have to the Blake2 hash in
>> > common use (I am always interested in learning the new features of
>> > Coreutils and have been a list reader for years now) I must pose the
>> > question:
>> >
>> > Due to md5's easy collision faults, when will the md5 algorithm be
>> > -removed- from coreutils / other security implementations, to prevent
>> > this sort of well-intentioned badness? When will "md5sum" spit out a
>> > string "DO NOT USE THIS ANYMORE" instead of actually working as
>> > historically was the case?
>>
>> We warn about md5 inadequacies in the info page:
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/md5sum
>> and in the bugs section of the man page:
>> http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/md5sum.1.html#BUGS
>>
>> I'm not sure it's worth going further at present.
>
> nor should we. md5's can be used in places where protection against
> malicious inputs isn't relevant, and you have backwards compat with
> existing tools. you could make the same argument for cksum.
> -mike
--
Regards,
Zooko Wilcox
Founder and Advisor
https://LeastAuthority.com — Freedom matters.
- Re: feature request for coreutils: b2sum,
Zooko Wilcoz <=