[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: performance bug of `wc -m`
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
Re: performance bug of `wc -m` |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2018 09:48:14 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 17/05/18 23:26, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> p.s. I'm slightly worried that the _existing_ fast path processing
> for the is_basic() set, may be too big a set for mbrtowc() avoidance
> for GB18030 for example?
Actually that existing optimization should be fine
as we're checking we're not in a shift state first.
cheers,
Pádraig
- performance bug of `wc -m`, Peng Yu, 2018/05/12
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Philip Rowlands, 2018/05/13
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Assaf Gordon, 2018/05/14
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Eric Fischer, 2018/05/16
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Eric Fischer, 2018/05/16
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Pádraig Brady, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`,
Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Bernhard Voelker, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Pádraig Brady, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Eric Fischer, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Eric Fischer, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, Pádraig Brady, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m`, L A Walsh, 2018/05/18
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m` on glibc systems, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/20
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m` on glibc systems, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/21
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m` on simulated macOS, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/20
- Re: performance bug of `wc -m` on macOS, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/20