[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option
|
From: |
aviva |
|
Subject: |
Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:49:22 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 3/11/20 3:27 PM, Leslie S Satenstein via GNU coreutils General
Discussion wrote:
> Did you check the dictionary meaning of clobber? I am happy to use it, but
> clobber means to abuse physically.
BTW- no it doesn't and your own post makes that 100% clear.
Thanks for playing the SJW game!
- Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Tomas Zubiri, 2020/03/11
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Pádraig Brady, 2020/03/11
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Leslie S Satenstein, 2020/03/11
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Kamil Dudka, 2020/03/11
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Leslie S Satenstein, 2020/03/11
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Tomas Zubiri, 2020/03/11
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, Bernhard Voelker, 2020/03/12
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, aviva, 2020/03/12
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option, aviva, 2020/03/12
- Re: Simpler name for --no-clobber option,
aviva <=