[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b
From: |
William Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2023 02:13:44 +0000 |
Has bash ever had a change before that would break valid scripts?
Could the printf format change be settable by a variable or by an option like
the -e/-E in echo?
Is it necessary for bash printf to match C printf?
I suppose that it is already decided.
Could the bash printf implementation warn if the new %b is passed something
that doesn't look like a numeric string?
Does shellcheck track variables well enough to warn if the new %b is passed
something that doesn't look like a numeric string?
Regards, William
________________________________
From: coreutils-bounces+williambader=hotmail.com@gnu.org
<coreutils-bounces+williambader=hotmail.com@gnu.org> on behalf of Chet Ramey
<chet.ramey@case.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 4:44 PM
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Cc: chet.ramey@case.edu <chet.ramey@case.edu>; enh <enh@google.com>; Eric Blake
<eblake@redhat.com>; Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>; coreutils@gnu.org
<coreutils@gnu.org>; bug-bash@gnu.org <bug-bash@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b
On 9/5/23 4:32 PM, Dragan Simic wrote:
> On 2023-09-05 22:25, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 9/5/23 3:58 PM, enh wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 6:59 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>> I think you'll find that, regardless of its origins, there are more
>>>> scripts
>>>> using the %b specifier than you think.
>>>
>>> i'd personally never heard of printf(1) %b before this thread, but
>>> debian code search agrees with you:
>>
>> It's a POSIX invention dating from at least 1991 (P1003.2-D11).
>>
>> The POSIX guidance to use it as a portable way to replace SysV echo has
>> dated from the same time. It's a pretty big lift to suddenly invalidate
>> all that prior art. ("POSIX giveth, and POSIX taketh away.").
>
> Are there any official explanations why is the invalidation actually
> happening now?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2023-08/msg00112.html
C23 is going to use %b to print binary literals.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Chet Ramey, 2023/09/01
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, enh, 2023/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Chet Ramey, 2023/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Dragan Simic, 2023/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Chet Ramey, 2023/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Rob Landley, 2023/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, enh, 2023/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Chet Ramey, 2023/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b,
William Bader <=
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Chet Ramey, 2023/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Eric Blake, 2023/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Chet Ramey, 2023/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Robert Elz, 2023/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Zachary Santer, 2023/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Robert Elz, 2023/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Eric Blake, 2023/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Pádraig Brady, 2023/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Zachary Santer, 2023/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] printf: add %#s alias to %b, Robert Elz, 2023/09/07