|
From: | Dragan Simic |
Subject: | Re: coreutils/man/rm.x - fails to mention POSIX "Refuse to remove path/. and path/.., as well as `.' and `..' |
Date: | Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:04:13 +0200 |
On 2023-09-25 12:58, Rob Landley wrote:
On 9/24/23 01:37, James Feeney via GNU coreutils General Discussion wrote:Sorry, that was probably a bit harsh.No, people used to regularly boggle at why info still exists: https://www.reddit.com/r/gnu/comments/240mle/why_does_gnu_cling_to_info/ https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/77514/what-is-gnu-info-for https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/159859/why-didnt-gnu-info-succeed-man https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxadmin/comments/27dxrr/does_anybody_use_gnu_info/ These days, info seems so dead nobody talks about it at all anymore.
Here's a brief insight into what happened about 15-20 years ago when I tried using GNU info for the first time... I failed to see how is it supposed to be used, and how the actual information is to be reached, after trying that for ~10 minutes or so, maybe even a few times, IIRC. Mind you, I _wanted_ to use info, and I did learn to use vim beforehand, which seems to be a posterboy for hard to use utilities.
Here's a patch I used to apply to binutils 11 years ago: https://github.com/landley/aboriginal/blob/master/sources/patches/binutils-screwinfo.patch Rob
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |