[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Still a need for [ and pinky info pages?
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: Still a need for [ and pinky info pages? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:16:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 12/02/2024 05:42, Collin Funk wrote:
Hello, I noticed an old FIXME note in coreutils.texi and TODO about
info pages for these programs. Is there still a need/desire for them?
I notice that `man [' opens the manpage for `test' so I assume there
isn't much need for a separate one. When opening the man page for
pinky the SEE ALSO section shows the following:
Full documentation <https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/pinky>
or available locally via: info '(coreutils) pinky invocation'
Since the page doesn't have a section the link leads to a page not
found screen and info will say it cannot find the given node. I think
that, if anything, it would be nice to have a pinky section just so
people aren't linked to an invalid page from the generated manual. I
would be willing to write it but I figured I should ask for thoughts
here first.
'[' is described in the 'test' man and info pages,
so that's probably best to leave as is.
Actually we should add '[' to the index,
which I've now done like:
@pindex test
+@pindex [
A basic info page for pinky would be appreciated.
thanks!
Pádraig