Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme

[Kai Großjohann]

On 14 May 2001, Gerd Moellmann wrote:

> My personal opinion is that it would be a mistake to try to replace
> ELisp with a different language; there's just too much ELisp out
> there which breaks even with small changes of semantics.

That's right.  I think the idea of the CLEmacs project by Erik Naggum
was to provide an ELisp emulation layer which automatically takes
effect for *.el files.  And I presume that the Guile-Emacs project had
something similar in mind.

I'm not sure if this is feasible, but Erik suggested it, and I have
great faith in his technical knowledge ;-)

kai
-- 
The passive voice should never be used.