[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames? |
Date: |
04 Mar 2002 22:29:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 13:33:43 -0500, "Stefan Monnier"
> <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > It wouldn't be "perfect" but should be mostly acceptable.
> >
> > I don't think that leaving dedicated frames as-is is a good answer [...]
>
> I'm starting to think that's one of those issues where there's
> considerable individual variation;
So maybe it could be customizeable (with sensible default setting).
A simple list with the frame parameters where changes should be
reflected on all frames could do the trick. [of course this
should be a defcustom], e.g.
(defvar frame-parameters-all-frames '(background-mode
scroll-bar-background scroll-bar-foreground border-color cursor-color
mouse-color background-color foreground-color font))
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames?, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/03/01
- Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/01
- Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/01
- Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/02
- Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames?, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/03/05