[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should invisible imply intangible? |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:30:17 -0700 (MST) |
Maybe I shouldn't be trying so hard ?
Since this runs only once when the user types a character, it need not
be super efficient.
Instead of optimizing this function I suspect it will be a bigger
optimization not to call it at all after a self-insert. It seems
clear to me that this adjustment is always a no-op after self-insert,
and most user input characters are self-inserting.
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/03
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/03
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/04
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/05
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/05
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/05
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/09
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/09
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/11
- Message not available
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/11
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/12
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/13