Re: address@hidden: rcs2log]

[Stefan Monnier]

> Why do you want to rename rcs2log to rcs2log.sh?  That seems to me to make
> the Windows installation more non-standard than necessary.

I just assumed that if rcs2log stays as it is, it might be run
instead of rcs2log.bat.  Whereas adding a .sh makes sure it won't
be considered as an executable, so rcs2log.bat will be run instead.
I agree that if it's not necessary, there's no point in making that
change.


        Stefan