[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cc-vars.el
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: cc-vars.el |
Date: |
20 Nov 2002 16:40:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Martin Stjernholm <address@hidden> writes:
> I got bugged by users enough to come up with the whole cc-bytecomp
> kludge, at least.
Why do users care about how the package is compiled? If they worry
about compilation warnings, they should be told not to unless they've
determined that they really indicate a bug.
> What would be the problem of adding a macro in the
> bytecomp environment to control the warning aspect only?
You can already turn off warnings (and CL actually has `declare'), but
doing that covered up bugs in W3, for instance.
- Re: cc-vars.el, (continued)
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el,
Dave Love <=
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/20