[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gdba probs
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: gdba probs |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:13:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:49:54AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > [Yeah I know gud.el is a big ball of hair already, but there's no sense
> > in making it worse]
>
> Which part are you thinking of ? It's really not that bad. It has
> annoying limitations due to excessive use of global state (you can't have
> both a GDB and a PerlDB running at the same time), but the code itself is
> pretty clean and simple if you ask me (at least the generic part of the
> code is very slim AFAIK).
Well, OK, I haven't really looked at the whole thing very closely, so perhaps
what I said above is unjustified. However, when I've had to fix a bug or
something in that code, I always come away feeling a bit dirty, and thinking
`boy somebody needs to clean this up.'
-Miles
--
We live, as we dream -- alone....
- Re: gdba probs, (continued)
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/06
- Re: gdba probs, Miles Bader, 2002/12/06
- Re: gdba probs, Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/09
- Re: gdba probs, Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/10
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/10
- Re: gdba probs, Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/11
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/11
- Re: gdba probs, Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/11
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/11
- Re: gdba probs, Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/12
- Re: gdba probs,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: gdba probs, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/13
- Re: gdba probs, Miles Bader, 2002/12/11
- Re: gdba probs, Kim F. Storm, 2002/12/12
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/14
Re: gdba probs, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/07
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/07
- Re: gdba probs, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/09
- Re: gdba probs, Nick Roberts, 2002/12/10
- Re: gdba probs, Kim F. Storm, 2002/12/10
- Re: gdba probs, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/12/11