Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el)

[Kim F. Storm]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > But "finished" is the wrong way to decribe delete-process.
> > "deleted" would be more appropriate.
> 
> Normally, you would use delete-process to close the connection.
> 
> So in that aspect "closed" would be better than "deleted".


To continue on this, what is the proper message to pass to the
sentinel if the connection was closed by remote peer (or broken).

Current message "exited abnormally with code 256" isn't very good, 
so perhaps we should change that as well (to what ...?)

However existing code may rely on the current message, so maybe we
need to leave it as is?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk