[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
|
Date: |
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:58:42 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>> Option `-Q' isn't documented in emacs --help.
>>
>> Would you like to fix that?
>
> The patch is trivial, but we should probably add a long name for it.
> What about `--bare'?
How about --plain or --vanilla?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Henrik Enberg, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/02
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/04