[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: sit-for (detect_input_pending ?) and postfix input m
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: sit-for (detect_input_pending ?) and postfix input methods.] |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:15:35 -0400 |
Then, why does sit-for return t if unread-command-events is not
nil?
That is a good question. Should it return nil immediately
without waiting when unread-command-events is nonempty?
That would be more coherent than the current behavior.
It would also be an incompatible change, and might break something.
There are about 550 calls to sit-for in the Emacs sources.
To check all of them would be a lot of work.
Perhaps we should make this change now, so that the pretesting
for the release will help us see if anything breaks.
What do people think?
Anyway, I installed your flyspell.el change as a work-around.