[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:57:43 -0600 (CST) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
I've made a decision that we need to change this. The current code is
not reliable enough and I will not stay with it.
I was _not_ arguing for staying with the current default situation.
As I said, I personally have `enable-local-variables' set to 'maybe
since ages, so obviously I have never trusted the current
`enable-local-eval'. But Chong's first patch was not safe enough
either. (There are problems with the second current patch in its
present form too, as I will point out separately.)
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/08
- Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10
- Re: Disabled commands, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/13
- Re: Disabled commands, Kim F. Storm, 2006/02/13
- Re: Disabled commands, Giorgos Keramidas, 2006/02/13
- Re: Disabled commands, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/13