Re: delete-process bug

[Michaël Cadilhac]

Agustin Martin <address@hidden> writes:

>> 1) (original test) Quick switching between two flyspellized buffers
>>    that have different dictionaries,
>
> Works very well

Fine!

>> 2) 
>>
>> (let (processes)
>>   (dotimes (i 100)
>>      (push (start-process "bug" nil "/tmp/sleep") processes))
>>    (dotimes (i 50)
>>      (if (zerop (mod i 2))
>>      (delete-process (pop processes))
>>        (kill-process (pop processes))))
>>    (message "%S" (call-process "/tmp/sleep"))
>>    (dotimes (i 50)
>>      (delete-process (pop processes)))
>>    (message "%S" (call-process "/tmp/sleep")))
>
> I am getting 
>
> if: Process bug<98> is not active

This is no bug in fact. The test I proposed is not really good, it
could try to kill dead processes, and it does. :-)

Thank you very much !

-- 
 |      Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac   |  Un certain Blaise Pascal              |
 |         Epita/LRDE Promo 2007   |    etc... etc...                       |
 | http://www.lrde.org/~cadilh_m   |  -- Prévert (Les paris stupides)       |
 `--  -   JID: address@hidden --'                                   -  --'

pgpLloJbOe1xv.pgp
Description: PGP signature