Re: text_property_stickiness

[Miles Bader]

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> So the only thing we have to worry about are a bunch of lisp-visible
> functions, Fdelete_field and so forth.  I think it is acceptable for
> us to handle this situation by the signalling of an args_out_of_range
> error, which, as you pointed out, already happens with the call to
> Fget_text_property in text_property_stickiness.

Why do you think an error is the correct thing here?

My feeling (when Richard brought this up earlier) was that perhaps the
out-of-range value should be constrained to be within BEGV-ZV.

-Miles

-- 
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
 you do it."  Mahatma Gandhi