[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:19:33 +0200 |
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, please incorporate the serial update of zone-mode. It uses the
> same format I use (and most people, I suppose), so that's good.
What I took from zone-mode is the fact that serials are incremented upon
saving, the updating code in dns-mode was already there and is much more
advanced than that of zone-mode (it supports a variety of formats).
--
Romain Francoise <address@hidden> | The sea! the sea! the open
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the
| ever free! --Bryan W. Procter
- dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Romain Francoise, 2006/08/09
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Simon Josefsson, 2006/08/09
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Bill Wohler, 2006/08/09
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el,
Romain Francoise <=
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Edward O'Connor, 2006/08/10
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Romain Francoise, 2006/08/11
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Bill Wohler, 2006/08/11
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Romain Francoise, 2006/08/12
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Bill Wohler, 2006/08/12
- Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, David Kastrup, 2006/08/12
Re: dns-mode.el vs. zone-mode.el, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/09