[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:33:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>> If we simply document that "timers (and process filters) should avoid
>> using sit-for", it should be clear to the reader that rare exceptions
>> may exist (especially if we add a comment to jit-lock-stealth-fontify
>> stating this). After the release, we can probably rework
>> jit-lock-stealth-fontify to avoid using sit-for, but I don't think the
>> current situation is bad enough to block the release.
>
> If you accept a pre-command-hook the attached patch would be a first
> step in that direction.
Is the pre-command-hook installed permanently, or only when jit-lock is
active?
IMHO, using a permanently installed pre-command-hook is not acceptable, but
it may be ok if only used temporarily...
But why is this needed at all?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/21