[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jit-lock timer etc.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: jit-lock timer etc. |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:20:41 -0400 |
I can hardly imagine emacs being idle for more than 2^28 seconds, so
it seems safe to simplify it to return a cons (SECS . USECS) [see patch
below]
I don't want to do that, because it would be incompatible with other
time values. I'd rather people use time-to-seconds to convert.
However, returning the value in floating point might be a good method.
But if we do that, we should call it float-idle-time.
- jit-lock timer etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Chong Yidong, 2006/08/21
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Chong Yidong, 2006/08/21
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/22
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/22
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., martin rudalics, 2006/08/23
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/23
- Re: jit-lock timer etc.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/24
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/24
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/24
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Chong Yidong, 2006/08/24
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/25
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/25
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/25
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Chong Yidong, 2006/08/25
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/26
- Re: jit-lock timer etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/24