[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/'
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/' |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:35:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) |
> The reason for Calc's current behavior is because Dave Gillespie,
> Calc's author, thought of "a b / c d" as representing
I expect the reason is slightly different: it's that the same rule is used
for "a * b / c * d" as for "a b / c d". The "juxtaposition operator" is
traditionally assumed to have the highest precedence, so it of course parses
as "(a b)/(c d)".
Stefan
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', (continued)
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Christian Schlauer, 2007/04/22
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Jay Belanger, 2007/04/22
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Jason Rumney, 2007/04/23
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Kim F. Storm, 2007/04/23
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Jay Belanger, 2007/04/23
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Christian Schlauer, 2007/04/25
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Jay Belanger, 2007/04/25
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/',
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Jay Belanger, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Christian Schlauer, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Davis Herring, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Luc Teirlinck, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Christian Schlauer, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Luc Teirlinck, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Christian Schlauer, 2007/04/26
- Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/', Jay Belanger, 2007/04/26