[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP
From: |
Zhang Wei |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:08:42 +0800 |
On 2/6/08, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:
> The bug should be fixed now, the minimum width and height of characters
> was being initialised to 1 (pixel), and not updated to the real value by
> the new font code, so redisplay was allocating far more memory than it
> needed to keep track of the displayed characters.
The bug is fixed, thank you.
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, (continued)
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Kenichi Handa, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Miles Bader, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/05
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/02/06
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Zhang Wei, 2008/02/02
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02