[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexbind
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: lexbind |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:18:58 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > I am not sure `defvar' is enough. The reason is that using it to fix
> > existing packages may require renaming.
>
> Yes, it may require renaming. It's usually not a big deal, tho.
>
> I think we would be better off also having other mechanisms
> for doing this, which do not require renaming.
Could you give a concrete example of what you're talking about?
-Miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!
- Re: lexbind, (continued)
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/05
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: lexbind, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/05