[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: display-buffer-other-frame - useful? doc string?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: display-buffer-other-frame - useful? doc string? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:19:40 -0800 |
> I agree with everything you said. However, I don't see
> that such a command would be very useful. Maybe the best
> thing to do is to remove it altogether
>
> It exists just for the sake of symmetry of the command set,
> since this is the natural thing for C-x 5 C-o to do.
> If having it is painful, we can get rid of it.
I proposed this fix. I think it DTRT.
(defun display-buffer-other-frame (buffer)
"Show BUFFER in another frame, but don't select it.
See documentation of `display-buffer' for more information."
(interactive "BDisplay buffer in other frame: ")
(let ((win (selected-window)))
(switch-to-buffer-other-frame buffer)
(select-window win)
(select-frame-set-input-focus (window-frame win))))
Re: display-buffer-other-frame - useful? doc string?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/10