[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1. |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:47:07 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:16:46 +0100, Jan Djärv <address@hidden> said:
> Sinc there has been no objections, I enabled this by default. You
> can pass --disable-sync-input to configure if there is problems.
> But I guess we soon will start take advantage of sync input so the
> disabled case will become obsolete. When we feel confident that
> sync input works, I'll remove the non-sync-input code.
Even with SYNC_INPUT, atimer functions (except poll_for_input)
may still call malloc in the signal handler context. So
emacs_blocked_malloc etc. were actually meaningful even in
SYNC_INPUT environments.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., (continued)
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12