|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: code completion |
Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:22:36 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Tom Tromey wrote:
"Pascal" == Pascal Bourguignon <address@hidden> writes:http://www.gccxml.org/Pascal> Will parsing of xml be faster in elisp than parsing C? You could always make it emit sexps :-)
Yes, seriously. Maybe those writing gcc-xml could accept it as an option. I guess it should be a very simple change to spit out elisp/lisp instead of xml, or?
Is gcc some kind of generic compiler that can handle other languages too?If I do not misremember/misunderstand I think that Eric Ludlam wrote that different parsers could be used by the CEDET/Semantic framework.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |