[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame
From: |
paul r |
Subject: |
Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:38:40 +0100 |
2008/3/26, Johan Bockgård <address@hidden>:
> There was a long thread about this a few years ago
>
> http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=<address@hidden>
>
I read with high interest, thank you for the pointer.
I think I can sum it up in 3 points :
- most people think of C-z as a first-class keystroke, and of
suspend-emacs as a second-class command (please feel free to suggest
better vocabulary than first and second class )
- a lot a people do unbind manually C-z to rebind it as to have a
totally dedicated "KeySpace" for their needs
- concerns where rised on two points : CUA uses C-z for undo (but
well, it also uses C-v for paste) ; and C-z has the meaning of suspend
for some people in TTYs (but C-c should have the meaning of kill
process as well, as someone mentioned)
My position now is :
- The rule for C-c LETTER is very subtle, and I'd prefer to see this
space reserved for mode-specific personnal keystrokes
- I like to think I am totally free for any binding from C-z, this
is my really own space and it is accessible from any mode
- CUA should be able to adapt, it can probably find room for a
personal KeySpace like C-z in its keymap (I notice C-y and C-c are
both bound to the same cua-paste, for example)
Last thread is more than 4 years old now, has your position evolved
since, and how please ?
Regards
-- Paul
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, (continued)
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Andreas Schwab, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, paul r, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/26
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, paul r, 2008/03/28
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/28
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, paul r, 2008/03/28
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/29
Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Johan Bockgård, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame,
paul r <=