[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:15:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> > You're talking to one of the persons who are convinced that Emacs and
> > XEmacs should (and do) profit from each other.
>
> I'm also one, and therefore object to calling parallel development in
> *friendly* competition a waste.
We agree here.
> I am sad that the GNU legal
> requirements present a barrier to flow of code and to some extent
> ideas from XEmacs to Emacs, but again that is a necessary outcome of
> the difference in goals. (The same kind of thing is a feature of GPL
> vs. BSD competition, of course.)
>
> > Agreed - if we were talking about Ispell and Aspell. Unfortunately,
> > development of these packages merely stalled and the newer ones like
> > Hunspell are hardly useful for Emacs (and XEmacs).
>
> Well, I don't know about that. Again, the parallel to Emacsen fails.
It was meant as a parallel to hypothetical, non-existing Emacsen. As a
parallel to Emacs and XEmacs it fails.
> In any case, we should think about what to do about this. Adapt
> Emacsen? Adapt the new spell-checkers? Ignore them?
- Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries, (continued)
- Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/06
- Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries, Sascha Wilde, 2008/04/06
- Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries, Agustin Martin Domingo, 2008/04/07
- hunspell support (Was Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries), Agustin Martin Domingo, 2008/04/07
- Re: hunspell support, Sascha Wilde, 2008/04/08
- Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/05
- Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries,
martin rudalics <=
Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/03