[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC state
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: VC state |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:45:15 -0700 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> >> - there should be a way to operate on (sub)directories.
>
> > You mean something more than M-x vc-status DIR/SUBDIR RET ?
>
> Yes. There's sometimes an important difference between passing "src/"
> as the argument vs passing all the files in "src/" that appear in the
> vc-status (beside the fact that the former does not require you to
> first mark each one of those files).
Many VC commands choke when given a directory parameter, so this does
not seem particularly useful at this time.
More, given that vc-status is still "experimental code", and there is no
clear path/criteria on getting it out of that state, I am not inclined
to put more effort in adding more features to it.
- VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/06
- Re: VC state,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/09
- VC development [was Re: VC state], Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/11
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/09