[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber
From: |
Sven Joachim |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:32:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110008 (No Gnus v0.8) Emacs/22.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
On 2008-04-12 15:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Peter Dyballa <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:00:23 +0200
>> Cc:
>>
>> This file is not deleted by 'make clean', so upon a new build its
>> number is incremented and more and more DOC files get installed.
>
> I think this is intended, as you still have the Emacs binary from the
> previous build (emacs-${version}.buildnumber) around, and could use
> it, e.g., for comparison or some other purpose.
That's not true, the Emacs binaries are all deleted by `make clean'.
I had already reported that inconsistency some months before, see my
message in [1] and Glenn's reply in [2].
Sven
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-07/msg01778.html
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-08/msg00004.html
- 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber,
Sven Joachim <=
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/12