[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:04:00 +0200 |
Am 12.04.2008 um 22:49 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
Then it is very useful to have a convenient unique identifier for
each build.
GNU Emacs has this information when you start to send a bug report.
Upon configuration some files are overwritten. Upon 'make bootstrap'
some more files are overwritten even twice. Upon 'make install' all
files (hopefully) are overwritten. Isn't that already enough uniqueness?
--
Greetings
Pete
To most people solutions mean finding the answers. But to chemists
solutions
are things that are still all mixed up.
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, (continued)
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Sven Joachim, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/13
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber,
Peter Dyballa <=
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/12
- Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber, Peter Dyballa, 2008/04/12