[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:48:46 +0100 |
>>>>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2008, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Consider the following scenario:
>> - emacs --daemon is running in the background without any open frame
>> - server-start is also called in another Emacs process
>> Now there is no more way to connect to the detached Emacs. (Or am I
>> missing something?)
>> Maybe it would be feasible to add a recovery mechanism for such a
>> case, like binding [sigusr1] to server-start?
> That would be easy to do, indeed. Another option is for server-start
> to try and detect that there's already an active socket (using
> server-running-p) and refuse to start.
Or both? The server process or socket could be non-functional for other
reasons.
In case server-start is changed, maybe an option to force a restart
should be added.
Ulrich
- Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Ulrich Mueller, 2008/11/04
- Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/05
- Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/11/06
- Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/06
- Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/11/06
- Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/06
- Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/11/07
Re: Lost socket for detached Emacs, how to regain control?,
Ulrich Mueller <=