[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: isearch and M-y/C-y
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: isearch and M-y/C-y |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:24:53 +0100 |
The current search C-y feature needs to be easy to type in order to
be any use. I think C-M-y would be too inconvenient, so it would
almost have the effect of eliminating this feature.
We use C-M-w already, and other C-M- combinations, so I cannot see how
that would be any more inconvient. Perhaps someone has a better idea
for a keybinding?
- isearch and M-y/C-y, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/16
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Juri Linkov, 2008/11/16
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/17
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Juri Linkov, 2008/11/18
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/18
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/19
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Juri Linkov, 2008/11/19
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, mail, 2008/11/20
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Eric Schulte, 2008/11/20
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/11/20
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/21
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/20
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2008/11/19
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/20
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Andreas Schwab, 2008/11/20
- Re: isearch and M-y/C-y, Miles Bader, 2008/11/20