[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: org changes lost
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: org changes lost |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:11:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> IIUC emacs-diffs should now be a superset of emacs-commit, so
> emacs-commit should not be necessary.
Okay, I'm just forwarding emacs-diffs.
>> I've not done this for all Emacs projects so far, partly because the
>> MAINTAINERS file might not be 100% accurate,
>
> It's OK if it's not accurate: that will hopefully prompt people to make
> it more accurate. But the main source of such info is in the header of
> each Elisp file (look for ";; Author:" or ";; Maintainer: " in the
> section between the first line and the ";;; Commentary"). Look at
> lisp-mnt.el for some utility functions that can find that field for you.
I understand the setup you have in mind, but I don't I don't feel
comfortable in automatically forwarding emails to people I don't know.
I suggest we first send an email to all the maintainers asking them if
they want such a reminder for themselves. Maybe most of them already
filter through [emacs-diffs] and don't need additional forwards. And
maybe encouraging *every* Emacs developer to only stay focused on his
own piece of code will is not a good thing to do.
Thoughts?
--
Bastien
- Re: org changes lost, (continued)
- Re: org changes lost, Yavor Doganov, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost, Carsten Dominik, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost, Michael Olson, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost, Bastien, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost, Carsten Dominik, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/25
- Re: org changes lost,
Bastien <=
Re: org changes lost, Carsten Dominik, 2008/11/24