[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-n and C-a
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: C-n and C-a |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:34:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> I personally like the new behavior, even though it is
> indeed inconsistent. But if people want to change the default,
> that's fine.
For whatever it's worth, I also like the new behavior. Somehow, it
gives better results than the more consistent alternatives I've tried.
- Re: C-n and C-a, (continued)
- Re: C-n and C-a, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/29
- Re: C-n and C-a, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/30
- Re: C-n and C-a, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/31
- Re: C-n and C-a, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/31
- Re: C-n and C-a, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/31
Re: C-n and C-a, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/30
Re: C-n and C-a, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/29
Re: C-n and C-a, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/29
Re: C-n and C-a, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/29