[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New sync'd branch
From: |
Dmitry Dzhus |
Subject: |
Re: New sync'd branch |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:24:33 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> - People installing changes need to carefully choose whether to install
> it on the 23 branch (from where it will be sync'd to the "24 branch"
> aka "trunk"), or on the trunk. Basically, the most important aspect
> is that any bugfix which makes sense on the 23 branch need to be
> installed on the 23 branch rather than on the trunk.
I don't know how things are set up, so what I don't understand is
whether the «new trunk» will be a complete superset of «23 branch»? If
some fix should go both to «pretty stable» and «unstable» branches, what
shall I do? Commit them separately? Maybe it's not a big problem really
given that probably not so many changes need to be in 23 branch instead
of just trunk, but it's unclear to me how the branches are synced.
--
Happy Hacking.
http://sphinx.net.ru
む
- New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/23
- Re: New sync'd branch, joakim, 2009/08/23
- Re: New sync'd branch,
Dmitry Dzhus <=
- Re: New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/25
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Teemu Likonen, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
- Re: New sync'd branch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Teemu Likonen, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Christian Faulhammer, 2009/08/27